This video is a perfect example of propaganda promoting Geo-engineering, chem trails & the aquatic cloud whitening strategy proposed by Bill Gates. In my opinion, if burning fossil fuels is impacting our climate on such a scale then why solve one problem by creating 10 more when we could be working towards eliminating the need to burn such harmful gasses. Instead, invest all efforts in eliminating the need for fossil fuels, hydrogen, solar, wind, water, magnetic – there are so many ways to generate energy, why the reliance on oil? It appears we are literally self destructing and have no regard for life itself… just as long as we can get on an airplane and be on the other side of the world in less than a day, who cares about the coming generations and how we leave the earth for them? who cares about our life expectancy, the disease and conditions we are susceptible to from aluminum and barium being injected into the air we breathe? who cares if bill gates/Bilderberg wants to inject 10,000 gallons of salt water per second into the lower atmosphere and potentially offset the entire marine ecosystem? That’s a severely flawed thought process and couldn’t be more selfish.

This is clearly not the way we should be spending our time. I know it’d be impossible to convince the people we need to disregard a lot of today’s technology and go back to riding in horse and buggies – but I don’t think that is necessarily needed either… What we do need (and sooner than later) is clean, environmentally neutral or even perhaps beneficial energy. We need to eliminate our dependance on fossil fuels and any of the harmful strategies we are utilizing to offset the ever so popular  “global warming.” If we can’t find a REAL solution to the problems we are facing, then maybe it IS time we reconsider a lot of modern day technology. I know it’s all great stuff, but…  televisions, computers, the internet, automobiles, airplanes… they all came in the last 100 years and they are already showing multiple side effects on our Earth and pose a definitive threat to our quality of life.  Perhaps “technology” is getting too out of hand, if we continue down this path creating problems and finding “solutions” to problems we create by creating additional problems, then this should tell us our demands out of life are beyond our means, and we need to deliberately take a step back until/unless we find neutral/safe alternatives that benefit or have no impact on our environment.